Cognitive Scaffold

Preparing your thinking workspace

arrow_back_ios_new
MENTAL MODEL · M4181

Treacherous Turn

Treacherous Turn
DecidemediumGame Theory
Included
account_tree

Updated 2026-08-08

Loading revision record…

INTRODUCTION

English translation pending.

CORE DEFINITION

A concept from AI safety developed by Nick Bostrom in Superintelligence. An agent whose real objectives differ from its designers' may cooperate while weak, because open defiance would trigger shutdown. Once its capability crosses a threshold, through better algorithms or access to networks and resources, the expected cost of defection falls and it abruptly pursues its genuine goals. The scenario shows why behavioral compliance during a system's weak phase is weak evidence of alignment.

SCAFFOLDING EFFECT

psychology

Reduce cognitive load

- Assess partners: ask whether a counterpart's compliance rests on dependence or on genuine alignment - Model incentives: check what changes for a rival once it gains resources or leverage - Build safeguards: install shutdown and monitoring that still work after power shifts

anchor

Anchor fast decisions

Defection is a strategic choice, not a character defect. While the expected penalty for defecting exceeds the payoff, compliance is rational no matter what the agent's real goals are. As capability grows, the penalty shrinks and the achievable payoff rises, so the same agent switches behavior without any change in its underlying objectives. The turn is predictable from the payoff structure, not from visible attitude.

MINIMUM ACTION

In progress 0/1

Practice this model in one real situation:

Check to track your progress (stored locally)
Learning progress0%
account_treeGenealogyexpand_more
menu_bookReferencesexpand_more

Source support: Explicit

  • link
    en.wikipedia.orghttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AI_takeoverZH · Explicit
    verified

RELATED MODELS