Seemingly Profound
Updated 2026-08-15
INTRODUCTION
English translation pending.
CORE DEFINITION
A concept from Daniel Dennett describing pronouncements that appear deep but collapse on inspection: read one way they are obvious platitudes, read another they are plainly false, and the ambiguity between the readings creates the impression of insight. The mechanism is deliberate or careless use of a term with multiple senses. The qualification is that the charge must be demonstrated by producing both readings, not merely asserted, since genuine insights can also sound strange on first hearing.
SCAFFOLDING EFFECT
Reduce cognitive load
- Dual reading: interpret the claim in its charitable sense and in its strong sense. - Triviality test: check whether one reading reduces to something nobody would dispute. - Falsity test: check whether the other reading makes a claim that is demonstrably wrong.
Anchor fast decisions
A sentence containing an ambiguous term supports several interpretations, and the reader supplies the interpretation that feels most profound. Because no single reading is fixed, the statement cannot be evaluated or falsified, which protects it from criticism while the impression of depth persists. Forcing both readings makes the ambiguity visible and the claim testable.
MINIMUM ACTION
In progress 0/1Practice this model in one real situation:
account_treeGenealogyexpand_more
menu_bookReferencesexpand_more
Source support: Explicit
- en.wikipedia.orghttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daniel_Dennettverified
PRIVATE NOTES · Only visible to you
SAVED Q&A
ENTRY Q&A · Private saving available
Ask with a clear boundary
thinkingmodels answers from published entry context only.
Your question is sent to thinkingmodels. The answer uses public entry context only.
RELATED MODELS