Cognitive Scaffold

Preparing your thinking workspace

arrow_back_ios_new
MENTAL MODEL · M10522

Graham's Hierarchy of Disagreement

Graham's Hierarchy of Disagreement
StructureHigh supportCritical Thinking
Included
account_tree

Version 1.0.0 · Updated 2026-07-30

CORE DEFINITION

Lowest level: name-calling (ad hominem). Middle levels: responding to tone, contradiction, counterargument. Highest level: refuting the central point (pointing out an error and explaining why it's wrong).

SCAFFOLDING EFFECT

psychology

Reduce cognitive load

To evaluate and improve the quality of argumentation. It helps identify which level one's own and others' arguments are at, guiding toward higher-quality discussion. Related variants: Graham's hierarchy of disagreement, Graham's discussion hierarchy, Graham's rebuttal hierarchy.

anchor

Anchor fast decisions

Paul Graham proposed a hierarchy of disagreement: from the weakest 'name-calling/responding to tone' to the strongest 'refuting the central point'. The higher the level, the more constructive.

MINIMUM ACTION

In progress 0/3

Practice this model in one real situation:

Check to track your progress (stored locally)
Learning progress0%
account_treeGenealogyexpand_more
menu_bookReferencesexpand_more

Source support: Explicit

  • link
    en.wikipedia.orghttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Graham_%28programmer%29ZH · Explicit
    verified

RELATED MODELS