Graham's Hierarchy of Disagreement
Version 1.0.0 · Updated 2026-07-30
CORE DEFINITION
Lowest level: name-calling (ad hominem). Middle levels: responding to tone, contradiction, counterargument. Highest level: refuting the central point (pointing out an error and explaining why it's wrong).
SCAFFOLDING EFFECT
Reduce cognitive load
To evaluate and improve the quality of argumentation. It helps identify which level one's own and others' arguments are at, guiding toward higher-quality discussion. Related variants: Graham's hierarchy of disagreement, Graham's discussion hierarchy, Graham's rebuttal hierarchy.
Anchor fast decisions
Paul Graham proposed a hierarchy of disagreement: from the weakest 'name-calling/responding to tone' to the strongest 'refuting the central point'. The higher the level, the more constructive.
MINIMUM ACTION
In progress 0/3Practice this model in one real situation:
account_treeGenealogyexpand_more
menu_bookReferencesexpand_more
Source support: Explicit
- en.wikipedia.orghttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Graham_%28programmer%29verified
PRIVATE NOTES · Only visible to you
SAVED Q&A
ENTRY Q&A · Private saving available
Ask with a clear boundary
thinkingmodels answers from published entry context only.
Your question is sent to thinkingmodels. The answer uses public entry context only.
RELATED MODELS