Parallel Thinking
Updated 2026-08-15
INTRODUCTION
English translation pending.
CORE DEFINITION
Parallel thinking is a method introduced by Edward de Bono and operationalised through his Six Thinking Hats. Instead of each participant defending a position, the whole group examines one mode of thought together, for example facts, then risks, then benefits, before moving to the next mode. The core proposition is that adversarial debate wastes effort on defending egos and systematically under-explores perspectives that nobody happens to champion. The key qualification is that parallel thinking reorganises criticism rather than removing it: critique remains, but it is performed by everyone at an agreed moment instead of by designated opponents.
SCAFFOLDING EFFECT
Reduce cognitive load
- Align The Direction: announce one thinking mode for the whole group before anyone speaks. - Rotate The Hats: move through modes in sequence so no angle is skipped or captured. - Collect Before Deciding: gather all parallel outputs into one picture, then choose.
Anchor fast decisions
In adversarial debate, each person's energy goes into defending an existing position, and the strongest arguer rather than the strongest argument tends to win. Forcing simultaneous direction removes the need to defend, so attention shifts to generating content. Because every participant contributes to the same lens, coverage of each perspective is more complete, and the later decision rests on a map instead of a contest.
MINIMUM ACTION
In progress 0/1Practice this model in one real situation:
account_treeGenealogyexpand_more
menu_bookReferencesexpand_more
Source support: Explicit
- en.wikipedia.orghttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edward_de_Bonoverified
PRIVATE NOTES · Only visible to you
SAVED Q&A
ENTRY Q&A · Private saving available
Ask with a clear boundary
thinkingmodels answers from published entry context only.
Your question is sent to thinkingmodels. The answer uses public entry context only.
RELATED MODELS