GIFT
Updated 2026-08-22
INTRODUCTION
English translation pending.
CORE DEFINITION
GIFT is a four-dimension framework for team retrospectives. Good captures what worked and should continue. Improve identifies what could have gone better. Facts records what objectively happened, anchoring the discussion in shared evidence. Try names a new approach the team will test next period. The design addresses two failure modes: retrospectives that list only problems and drain morale, and retrospectives that drift into competing narratives about what occurred. Separating facts from interpretation is the distinctive step, since most disagreements about improvement turn out to be disagreements about what happened. The framework ends with a testable experiment rather than a general intention.
SCAFFOLDING EFFECT
Reduce cognitive load
- Use fact separation: agree on what happened before discussing what to do about it. - Use balance capture: collect good and improve items in parallel so neither dominates. - Use experiment framing: turn the Try item into a bounded test with a review date.
Anchor fast decisions
Retrospective discussions stall when participants argue from different recollections, because the disagreement is about facts while the conversation is about solutions. Recording facts first removes that layer of conflict, so the improvement discussion starts from shared ground. Pairing Good with Improve keeps the session from becoming a complaint list, which protects the willingness to raise problems. The Try step then converts the discussion into a bounded experiment, which lets the next retrospective evaluate whether the change worked instead of restating the same issues.
MINIMUM ACTION
In progress 0/1Practice this model in one real situation:
account_treeGenealogyexpand_more
menu_bookReferencesexpand_more
Source support: Explicit
- en.wikipedia.orghttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/After-action_reviewverified
PRIVATE NOTES · Only visible to you
SAVED Q&A
ENTRY Q&A · Private saving available
Ask with a clear boundary
thinkingmodels answers from published entry context only.
Your question is sent to thinkingmodels. The answer uses public entry context only.
RELATED MODELS