Beijing Consensus
Version 1.0.0 · Updated 2026-07-28
CORE DEFINITION
Beijing Consensus is a term in political science and economics, referring to a political and economic model developed by the People's Republic of China, distinct from the Washington Consensus, and similar in meaning to the China Model. Joshua Cooper, a senior advisor at Goldman Sachs, published a research paper at the Foreign Policy Centre in London, UK, pointing out that China, through hard work, proactive innovation, and bold experimentation, has found a development model suitable for its national conditions. He called this model the "Beijing Consensus." Joshua Cooper noted that the "Beijing Consensus" is characterized by hard work, proactive innovation, and bold experimentation (such as establishing special economic zones), resolute defense of national sovereignty and interests (such as handling the Taiwan issue), and gradual progress (such as "crossing the river by feeling the stones"), accumulating energy and using tools of asymmetric power (such as accumulating $400 billion in foreign exchange reserves). It focuses not only on economic development but also on social change, involving politics, quality of life, and the global balance of power, reflecting a development approach that seeks justice and high-quality growth.
SCAFFOLDING EFFECT
Reduce cognitive load
Beijing Consensus is a term in political science and economics, referring to a political and economic model developed by the People's Republic of China, distinct from the Washington Consensus, and similar in meaning to the China Model. Joshua Cooper, a senior advisor at Goldman Sachs, published a research paper at the Foreign Policy Centre in London, UK, pointing out that China, through hard work, proactive innovation, and bold experimentation, has found a development model suitable for its national conditions. He called this model the "Beijing Consensus."
Anchor fast decisions
Beijing Consensus is a term relative to the "Washington Consensus" (free market + democratic conditions), emphasizing a development path led by the state, gradual and pragmatic, with independent innovation and self-determination. Its core is "model diversity"—there is no single standard answer for modernization; effective paths should be explored based on one's own constraints, with effectiveness rather than dogma as the criterion.
MINIMUM ACTION
In progress 0/4Practice this model in one real situation:
account_treeGenealogyexpand_more
menu_bookReferencesexpand_more
Source support: Explicit
- zh.wikipedia.orghttps://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E5%8C%97%E4%BA%AC%E5%85%B1%E8%AF%86verified
PRIVATE NOTES · Only visible to you
SAVED Q&A
ENTRY Q&A · Private saving available
Ask with a clear boundary
thinkingmodels answers from published entry context only.
Your question is sent to thinkingmodels. The answer uses public entry context only.
RELATED MODELS