Social Dominance Theory
Version 1.0.0 · Updated 2026-07-30
CORE DEFINITION
Human societies tend to form group-based hierarchical structures (e.g., age, gender, and ethnic hierarchies). These hierarchies are maintained by 'legitimizing myths' (e.g., eugenics, meritocracy). There is always a force in society that attempts to maintain this hierarchy (social dominance orientation) and another force that attempts to flatten it.
SCAFFOLDING EFFECT
Reduce cognitive load
The structural dynamics of inequality. It explains why discrimination and oppression are so persistent. Because hierarchical structures provide stability and resources for the top, and a (illusory) sense of order for the bottom. To break it, one must attack both the hierarchical structure itself and the 'myths' behind it.
Anchor fast decisions
The theory posits a universal tendency in human social organization towards intergroup hierarchy (stratification). Individuals possess a stable personality dimension called 'social dominance orientation' (SDO); those high in SDO are more supportive of hierarchy and inequality. Institutions, cultural narratives, and 'legitimizing myths' work together to make even the lower strata partially internalize the hierarchical order, thereby maintaining system stability.
MINIMUM ACTION
In progress 0/2Practice this model in one real situation:
account_treeGenealogyexpand_more
menu_bookReferencesexpand_more
Source support: Explicit
- en.wikipedia.orghttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_dominance_theoryverified
PRIVATE NOTES · Only visible to you
SAVED Q&A
ENTRY Q&A · Private saving available
Ask with a clear boundary
thinkingmodels answers from published entry context only.
Your question is sent to thinkingmodels. The answer uses public entry context only.
RELATED MODELS