Hamilton-Zuk Hypothesis
Updated 2026-08-08
INTRODUCTION
English translation pending.
CORE DEFINITION
Proposed by William Hamilton and Marlene Zuk. Elaborate ornaments such as a peacock's tail are costly to produce and maintain, and their expression depends on the bearer's health. Because parasites impose continuous selection pressure, only individuals with strong resistance can afford full ornamentation, so the display reliably advertises low parasite load and good genes. The hypothesis explains why costly signals remain honest and why females rely on them in mate choice.
SCAFFOLDING EFFECT
Reduce cognitive load
- Test signals: ask whether a display is expensive enough that weak competitors could not fake it - Read status markers: interpret costly credentials and philanthropy as signals of underlying capacity - Detect cheap talk: discount claims that cost the claimant nothing to make
Anchor fast decisions
A signal stays honest only when producing it is costly and the cost falls as quality rises. Ornament expression depends on health, and health depends on parasite resistance, so only high-quality individuals can pay the full price. Cheap imitation is unstable, because fakers would flood the market until the signal lost value, which is why costly displays stay informative over evolutionary time.
MINIMUM ACTION
In progress 0/1Practice this model in one real situation:
account_treeGenealogyexpand_more
menu_bookReferencesexpand_more
Source support: Explicit
- pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.govhttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7123238/verified
PRIVATE NOTES · Only visible to you
SAVED Q&A
ENTRY Q&A · Private saving available
Ask with a clear boundary
thinkingmodels answers from published entry context only.
Your question is sent to thinkingmodels. The answer uses public entry context only.
RELATED MODELS