Cognitive Scaffold

Preparing your thinking workspace

arrow_back_ios_new
MENTAL MODEL · M4213

Interactional Justice

Interactional Justice
BehaviorHigh supportSocial Psychology
Included
account_tree

Updated 2026-08-01

Loading revision record…

INTRODUCTION

English translation pending.

CORE DEFINITION

Introduced by Robert Bies and Joseph Moag and later split by Bies into interpersonal and informational justice. Interactional justice concerns the quality of treatment people receive while a decision is enacted, covering respect and politeness on one side and timely, candid explanation on the other. It predicts trust in authorities, emotional reactions, and behavioral intentions independently of distributive and procedural justice, and it matters most when outcomes are unfavorable.

SCAFFOLDING EFFECT

psychology

Reduce cognitive load

- Deliver bad news: give the reasoning before the verdict and use respectful language - Explain decisions: state the criteria used so the other person can understand the why - Read reactions: treat emotional response as information about treatment, not as fragility

anchor

Anchor fast decisions

People judge a decision partly by what they receive and partly by how they were treated while receiving it. A clear explanation lets them attribute the outcome to criteria rather than to personal rejection, and respectful delivery signals that the relationship is intact. When either element is missing, the same outcome feels like a verdict on their worth, producing resentment, withdrawal, and resistance.

MINIMUM ACTION

In progress 0/1

Practice this model in one real situation:

Check to track your progress (stored locally)
Learning progress0%
account_treeGenealogyexpand_more
menu_bookReferencesexpand_more

Source support: Explicit

  • link
    en.wikipedia.orghttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interactional_justiceZH · Explicit
    verified

RELATED MODELS