Post Hoc Fallacy
Version 1.0.0 · Updated 2026-07-30
CORE DEFINITION
Full name: Post hoc ergo propter hoc (after this, therefore because of this). Simply because B occurs after A, one assumes A caused B. For example, 'The rooster crowed, the sun rose, so the rooster's crow caused the sun to rise.'
SCAFFOLDING EFFECT
Reduce cognitive load
Temporal order ≠ causal order. When reviewing successful experiences, it is particularly easy to make this mistake. 'We changed our logo, and sales went up.' It might just be because the peak season arrived. Controlled variable experiments are necessary.
Anchor fast decisions
The post hoc fallacy (Post hoc ergo propter hoc) asserts that because B occurs after A, A causes B, confusing temporal sequence with causation.
MINIMUM ACTION
In progress 0/2Practice this model in one real situation:
account_treeGenealogyexpand_more
menu_bookReferencesexpand_more
Source support: Explicit
- zh.wikipedia.orghttps://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E5%BE%8C%E6%AD%A4%E8%AC%AC%E8%AA%A4verified
PRIVATE NOTES · Only visible to you
SAVED Q&A
ENTRY Q&A · Private saving available
Ask with a clear boundary
thinkingmodels answers from published entry context only.
Your question is sent to thinkingmodels. The answer uses public entry context only.
RELATED MODELS