Mutual Assured Destruction, MAD
Version 1.0.0 · Updated 2026-07-30
CORE DEFINITION
A Nash equilibrium state. If both sides possess nuclear weapons capable of destroying each other and have 'second-strike' capability (the ability to retaliate after being attacked), then no side dares to start a war. The result is that the era with the most powerful weapons of destruction actually brought the longest peace (the Cold War). -
SCAFFOLDING EFFECT
Reduce cognitive load
Peace brought by deterrence. - In the workplace or business, 'peace' is often not based on goodwill, but on the deterrence of 'I have the ability to destroy you, but I choose not to'. The best way to avoid being bullied is not to show weakness, but to display your 'nuclear button' (core resources, legal means, destructive power).
Anchor fast decisions
MAD: In the nuclear age, if both sides have second-strike capability, a full-scale war would inevitably lead to mutual destruction, which in turn deters the initiation of war.
MINIMUM ACTION
In progress 0/1Practice this model in one real situation:
account_treeGenealogyexpand_more
menu_bookReferencesexpand_more
Source support: Explicit
- zh.wikipedia.orghttps://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E7%9B%B8%E4%BA%92%E4%BF%9D%E8%AD%89%E6%AF%80%E6%BB%85verified
PRIVATE NOTES · Only visible to you
SAVED Q&A
ENTRY Q&A · Private saving available
Ask with a clear boundary
thinkingmodels answers from published entry context only.
Your question is sent to thinkingmodels. The answer uses public entry context only.
RELATED MODELS