The Incommensurability of Scientific Theories
Updated 2026-09-10
INTRODUCTION
English translation pending.
CORE DEFINITION
Incommensurable originally means that two magnitudes have no common unit of measurement, as with the side and diagonal of a square. Around 1962, Thomas Kuhn and Paul Feyerabend borrowed the mathematical notion to describe the relation between successive scientific theories: old and new theories lack a shared standard of measurement and cannot be compared item by item.
SCAFFOLDING EFFECT
Reduce cognitive load
- Assess paradigm change: resist scoring a new theory by the old theory's standards and mistaking incomparability for backwardness. - Question progress narratives: ask whether the meaning of terms has shifted, and whether progress can be cumulative convergence on truth. - Use indirect measures: compare rival theories by translatability and explanatory power when no common yardstick exists.
Anchor fast decisions
The side and diagonal of a square cannot be divided by a single common unit and can only be expressed by irrational numbers. By analogy, if a theory's central terms, references, and standards of evaluation change with the paradigm, old and new theories share no measuring language, and progress cannot be stated simply as cumulative approximation to truth.
MINIMUM ACTION
In progress 0/1Practice this model in one real situation:
account_treeGenealogyexpand_more
menu_bookReferencesexpand_more
Source support: Explicit
- plato.stanford.eduhttps://plato.stanford.edu/entries/incommensurability/verified
PRIVATE NOTES · Only visible to you
SAVED Q&A
ENTRY Q&A · Private saving available
Ask with a clear boundary
thinkingmodels answers from published entry context only.
Your question is sent to thinkingmodels. The answer uses public entry context only.
RELATED MODELS