The Problem of Dirty Hands
Updated 2026-09-10
INTRODUCTION
English translation pending.
CORE DEFINITION
The problem of dirty hands asks whether political leaders should violate the deepest moral constraints in order to bring great good to the community or avert disaster. All versions share the point that correct political action sometimes conflicts with profound moral requirements, so that an agent may act rightly and still be morally stained. The idea is associated with Machiavelli and with political realism.
SCAFFOLDING EFFECT
Reduce cognitive load
- Surface the conflict: identify situations where the right action still does wrong, refusing a black-and-white reading. - Press responsibility: separate the act being right from the agent being clean, and ask who bears the cost. - Keep the stain: after a tragic choice, preserve moral residue rather than letting results whitewash the means.
Anchor fast decisions
The tension is that three claims cannot easily hold together: political agents have a special duty to promote the public good; moral constraints such as not killing the innocent are near absolute; and those constraints must sometimes be violated. Accepting only the first two collapses into absolutism, accepting the first and the last becomes consequentialist apology. A justified violation still leaves moral residue.
MINIMUM ACTION
In progress 0/1Practice this model in one real situation:
account_treeGenealogyexpand_more
menu_bookReferencesexpand_more
Source support: Explicit
- plato.stanford.eduhttps://plato.stanford.edu/entries/dirty-hands/verified
PRIVATE NOTES · Only visible to you
SAVED Q&A
ENTRY Q&A · Private saving available
Ask with a clear boundary
thinkingmodels answers from published entry context only.
Your question is sent to thinkingmodels. The answer uses public entry context only.
RELATED MODELS