Cognitive Scaffold

Preparing your thinking workspace

arrow_back_ios_new
MENTAL MODEL · M13169

Regularity and Inferential Theories of Causation

Regularity and Inferential Theories of Causation
TechnicalHigh supportScientific Methodology
Included
account_tree

Updated 2026-09-10

Loading revision record…

INTRODUCTION

English translation pending.

CORE DEFINITION

The regularity theory holds that causes are constantly conjoined with their effects. Its most influential version is David Hume's, refined by John Stuart Mill to require that the relevant constant conjunction be a law of nature rather than an accidental generalization. Widely accepted until Lewis's counterfactual analysis displaced it, the approach remains closely tied to inferential accounts of causation and is partly revived within causal modeling.

SCAFFOLDING EFFECT

psychology

Reduce cognitive load

- Test constancy: ask whether the effect always follows the cause, reducing causation to observable repetition. - Separate law from coincidence: distinguish a genuine law of nature from an accidental regularity. - Spot partial conditions: recognize that a common cause is often only part of a sufficient condition.

anchor

Anchor fast decisions

The regularity theory has a direct motivation: we observe similar results after similar causes, so causation is identified with that repeated pattern. Its classic difficulties are that constant conjunction is not causation, that accidental generalizations are not laws, and that a real cause is often only an INUS condition. Contemporary versions use ranking functions and related tools to handle these counterexamples.

MINIMUM ACTION

In progress 0/1

Practice this model in one real situation:

Check to track your progress (stored locally)
Learning progress0%
account_treeGenealogyexpand_more
menu_bookReferencesexpand_more

Source support: Explicit

  • link
    plato.stanford.eduhttps://plato.stanford.edu/entries/causation-regularity/ZH · Explicit
    verified

RELATED MODELS