Avoid the Strong, Strike the Weak
Updated 2026-08-22
INTRODUCTION
English translation pending.
CORE DEFINITION
The maxim comes from Sun Tzu's Art of War, which compares military action to water: as water avoids the high ground and flows to the low, a force should avoid what is solid and strike what is empty. The core claim is that victory is won by choosing the point of contact rather than by maximizing total strength, so relative advantage at one location matters more than aggregate power. The qualification is that the choice requires reconnaissance and mobility, since a force that cannot move or see cannot select its ground.
SCAFFOLDING EFFECT
Reduce cognitive load
- Battlefield choice: map where the rival is strong and where the defense is thin before committing. - Resource focus: concentrate your limited strength on the segment you can actually win. - Asymmetry hunt: look for the overlooked market or channel the leader cannot profitably defend.
Anchor fast decisions
Strength is only decisive where it is applied, so a larger force spread across a broad front is locally weak at many points. Attacking a thin point converts a global disadvantage into a local advantage, and a local breakthrough can then unravel the whole position. The principle therefore rewards information and movement over accumulation, because choosing the ground substitutes for out-producing the rival.
MINIMUM ACTION
In progress 0/1Practice this model in one real situation:
account_treeGenealogyexpand_more
menu_bookReferencesexpand_more
Source support: Explicit
- zh.wikipedia.orghttps://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E5%AD%99%E5%AD%90%E5%85%B5%E6%B3%95verified
PRIVATE NOTES · Only visible to you
SAVED Q&A
ENTRY Q&A · Private saving available
Ask with a clear boundary
thinkingmodels answers from published entry context only.
Your question is sent to thinkingmodels. The answer uses public entry context only.
RELATED MODELS