Paradox of Thrift
Updated 2026-08-13
INTRODUCTION
English translation pending.
CORE DEFINITION
The paradox of thrift holds that in a recession, when every household saves more and spends less, aggregate demand falls, income and employment contract, and the saving each household pursued becomes harder or impossible to achieve. The core proposition, set out by Keynes, is that saving is individually rational yet collectively self-defeating, a fallacy of composition in which what holds for one part fails for the whole. The key qualification is that the paradox belongs to a downturn with idle capacity; in the long run saving still funds investment.
SCAFFOLDING EFFECT
Reduce cognitive load
- Level distinction: ask whether the reasoning holds for one household or for the whole economy. - Demand check: in a downturn, trace what happens to income when everyone cuts spending. - Policy inversion: expect public spending to rise when private saving does, not to follow it.
Anchor fast decisions
One household's spending is another household's income, so a general retreat from spending reduces the income out of which saving is drawn; each saver's attempt to build a buffer shrinks the total from which all buffers come. The loop runs from saving to lower demand to lower output and employment and back to lower income, which is why the aggregate outcome inverts the individual intention.
MINIMUM ACTION
In progress 0/1Practice this model in one real situation:
account_treeGenealogyexpand_more
menu_bookReferencesexpand_more
Source support: Explicit
- en.wikipedia.orghttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paradox_of_thriftverified
PRIVATE NOTES · Only visible to you
SAVED Q&A
ENTRY Q&A · Private saving available
Ask with a clear boundary
thinkingmodels answers from published entry context only.
Your question is sent to thinkingmodels. The answer uses public entry context only.
RELATED MODELS