Principle and Expediency
Updated 2026-08-15
INTRODUCTION
English translation pending.
CORE DEFINITION
In the Confucian framework, jing is the constant principle, such as the rule that men and women should not touch hands when passing objects, while quan is the weighing of circumstance that permits deviation, as when one pulls a drowning sister-in-law from the water by the hand. The core proposition is that principles and flexibility are not opposites but a hierarchy: when a formal rule conflicts with a higher value such as preserving life, the exception fulfills the principle rather than violating it. The key qualification is that quan requires justification by a higher value rather than by personal convenience, and its use must be reviewed afterwards to prevent it from becoming routine.
SCAFFOLDING EFFECT
Reduce cognitive load
- Principle naming: state the rule you are about to depart from and why it exists. - Higher-value test: confirm that a genuinely higher value, not convenience, justifies the exception. - Post-hoc review: examine each exception afterwards and decide whether it should become a rule.
Anchor fast decisions
Rules are written for typical cases and encode the values that usually apply. In an extreme case those values conflict, and following the rule would defeat the very purpose it serves. Ranking values explicitly allows the higher one to govern, while the requirement of justification prevents the same move from being used to escape rules that merely inconvenience.
MINIMUM ACTION
In progress 0/1Practice this model in one real situation:
account_treeGenealogyexpand_more
menu_bookReferencesexpand_more
Source support: Explicit
- zh.wikipedia.orghttps://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E7%BB%8F%E6%9D%83verified
PRIVATE NOTES · Only visible to you
SAVED Q&A
ENTRY Q&A · Private saving available
Ask with a clear boundary
thinkingmodels answers from published entry context only.
Your question is sent to thinkingmodels. The answer uses public entry context only.
RELATED MODELS