Newcomb's Paradox
Version 1.0.0 · Updated 2026-07-28
CORE DEFINITION
In philosophy and mathematics, Newcomb's problem, also known as Newcomb's paradox, is a thought experiment posing a decision problem in which a player must decide whether to choose one of two or both boxes under conditions in which a being, often called the "predictor", decides in advance what they contain, and is able to predict the player's choices with near-certainty.
SCAFFOLDING EFFECT
Reduce cognitive load
In philosophy and mathematics, Newcomb's problem, also known as Newcomb's paradox, is a thought experiment posing a decision problem in which a player must decide whether to choose one of two or both
Anchor fast decisions
Same as Newcomb's paradox: A super predictor presents two boxes, Box A transparent with $1,000, Box B opaque with $1 million or nothing; if you take only B, it contains $1 million; if you take both, it contains nothing. Causal decision theory says take only B (since the prediction is already made), while evidential decision theory says take both (based on correlation with the prediction). Belief determines strategy.
MINIMUM ACTION
In progress 0/4Practice this model in one real situation:
account_treeGenealogyexpand_more
menu_bookReferencesexpand_more
Source support: Explicit
- en.wikipedia.orghttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newcomb%27s_problemverified
PRIVATE NOTES · Only visible to you
SAVED Q&A
ENTRY Q&A · Private saving available
Ask with a clear boundary
thinkingmodels answers from published entry context only.
Your question is sent to thinkingmodels. The answer uses public entry context only.
RELATED MODELS