Fierce Dogs and Shrine Rats
Updated 2026-08-22
INTRODUCTION
English translation pending.
CORE DEFINITION
From the Han Feizi: a wine seller whose stock spoiled unsold because a fierce dog at the door frightened customers, and shrine rats that could not be killed without damaging the sacred image they lived under. The two images name distinct organizational pathologies. The dog represents intermediaries such as gatekeepers or front-line staff who block access to something good. The rat represents insiders who are untouchable because attacking them would damage an institution others depend on. The qualification is diagnostic: not every gatekeeper is a dog and not every protected insider is a rat.
SCAFFOLDING EFFECT
Reduce cognitive load
- Channel audit: check whether front-line staff or interfaces are repelling users from a good product. - Protection trace: when a bad actor cannot be removed, identify what valuable asset shields them. - Decoupling move: separate the shielded function from the individual so removal becomes possible.
Anchor fast decisions
Value created upstream is destroyed at the point of contact, so a good product can fail because the interface in front of it repels users, and the producer misreads the failure as a product problem. Separately, an actor bound to a valued institution becomes costly to remove, so abuse persists because every attempt to correct it threatens something the organization needs, and the cost of removal is transferred to whoever tries.
MINIMUM ACTION
In progress 0/1Practice this model in one real situation:
account_treeGenealogyexpand_more
menu_bookReferencesexpand_more
Source support: Explicit
- zh.wikipedia.orghttps://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E9%9F%A9%E9%9D%9E%E5%AD%90verified
PRIVATE NOTES · Only visible to you
SAVED Q&A
ENTRY Q&A · Private saving available
Ask with a clear boundary
thinkingmodels answers from published entry context only.
Your question is sent to thinkingmodels. The answer uses public entry context only.
RELATED MODELS