Alternative Uses Task
Updated 2026-08-13
INTRODUCTION
English translation pending.
CORE DEFINITION
In the classic divergent-thinking test, a participant is given an ordinary object, such as a brick, and asked to list as many unconventional uses for it as possible within a time limit. The responses are scored on fluency, the number of ideas, flexibility, the variety of categories they span, and originality, their rarity. The task deliberately withholds the object's conventional purpose, because the goal is to train the ability to see possibilities in an object beyond the function it was assigned.
SCAFFOLDING EFFECT
Reduce cognitive load
- Warm up randomly: pick any object and generate its uses under a fixed time limit. - Withhold the purpose: ignore the intended function so alternatives can appear. - Push past the obvious: keep generating until rare and strange uses begin to emerge.
Anchor fast decisions
Familiarity with an object's intended function suppresses every other reading of it, a constraint called functional fixedness. Forcing generation without judgment floods working memory with candidate uses, and once the common ones are exhausted, the search must reach into distant categories. The volume requirement is what does the work: original responses appear only after the obvious pool is drained, which is why fluency predicts originality.
MINIMUM ACTION
In progress 0/1Practice this model in one real situation:
account_treeGenealogyexpand_more
menu_bookReferencesexpand_more
Source support: Explicit
- en.wikipedia.orghttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Divergent_thinkingverified
PRIVATE NOTES · Only visible to you
SAVED Q&A
ENTRY Q&A · Private saving available
Ask with a clear boundary
thinkingmodels answers from published entry context only.
Your question is sent to thinkingmodels. The answer uses public entry context only.
RELATED MODELS