Reflective Dialogue
Updated 2026-08-11
INTRODUCTION
English translation pending.
CORE DEFINITION
Reflective dialogue is a conversation in which the parties jointly examine their own assumptions, reasoning processes, and mental models rather than exchanging conclusions. Its premise is that a conclusion is only as good as the process that produced it, and that the process is invisible to its holder until another person's questions expose it, which makes the dialogue a diagnostic instrument rather than a debate.
SCAFFOLDING EFFECT
Reduce cognitive load
- Pick the right partner: choose someone who will challenge rather than agree. - Ask don't argue: use questions rather than rebuttals. - Write down what shifts: record the assumption that got exposed.
Anchor fast decisions
Reasoning flaws are transparent from outside and opaque from inside, because the reasoner's attention sits on the content while the structure runs unexamined beneath it. A second person's questions interrupt that opacity, and the interruption is what allows the assumption to be inspected rather than merely held.
MINIMUM ACTION
In progress 0/1Practice this model in one real situation:
account_treeGenealogyexpand_more
menu_bookReferencesexpand_more
Source support: Explicit
- doi.orghttps://doi.org/10.1080/095183998236944verified
PRIVATE NOTES · Only visible to you
SAVED Q&A
ENTRY Q&A · Private saving available
Ask with a clear boundary
thinkingmodels answers from published entry context only.
Your question is sent to thinkingmodels. The answer uses public entry context only.
RELATED MODELS