Paradox of Value
Version 1.0.0 · Updated 2026-07-30
CORE DEFINITION
Smith proposed that water is extremely important for life yet cheap, while diamonds are almost useless yet expensive. This is explained by marginal utility rather than total utility differences.
SCAFFOLDING EFFECT
Reduce cognitive load
The paradox of value, also known as the diamond–water paradox, is the paradox that, although water is on the whole more useful in terms of survival than diamonds, diamonds command a higher price in the market. The philosopher Adam Smith is often considered to be the classic presenter of this paradox…
Anchor fast decisions
Marginal utility theory explains: water has a large total quantity and low marginal utility; diamonds are scarce and have high marginal utility. Therefore, price is determined by marginal utility and scarcity, not total utility.
MINIMUM ACTION
In progress 0/2Practice this model in one real situation:
account_treeGenealogyexpand_more
menu_bookReferencesexpand_more
Source support: Explicit
- en.wikipedia.orghttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paradox_of_valueverified
PRIVATE NOTES · Only visible to you
SAVED Q&A
ENTRY Q&A · Private saving available
Ask with a clear boundary
thinkingmodels answers from published entry context only.
Your question is sent to thinkingmodels. The answer uses public entry context only.
RELATED MODELS