MENTAL MODEL · M7036

Three Criteria Method

DecideHigh supportDecision Science

Included

Version 1.0.0 · Updated 2026-07-30

CORE DEFINITION

Three standards for judging whether a statement or theory is correct: 1. Base it on the deeds of the ancient sage kings (historical experience); 2. Examine the actual experiences of the common people (objective facts); 3. Apply it in governance and observe its benefits to the state and the people (practical utility).

SCAFFOLDING EFFECT

psychology

Reduce cognitive load

Positivism/logical verification. When making decisions, audit using the 'Three Criteria': Is there precedent? Is there data? Is there actual benefit? All three are indispensable.

anchor

Anchor fast decisions

Using 'triple evidence' to prevent bias: historical experience (avoid repeating predecessors' mistakes), sensory/empirical facts (avoid empty talk), and practical utility (avoid detachment from interests). These three form a closed-loop verification of 'experience—fact—value,' approaching modern positivism and utilitarianism, emphasizing that statements must pass the triple test of being observable, verifiable, and beneficial.

MINIMUM ACTION

In progress 0/6

Practice this model in one real situation:

Formulate the claim: Clearly state the proposition or plan to be tested.
Criterion One (based on the past): Check whether historical precedents and existing experience support it.
Criterion Two (examine experiences): Use observable facts/data to verify, rather than assuming.
Criterion Three (apply in governance): Deduce the actual benefits and harms after implementation, whether it benefits the state and the people.
Accept only if all three criteria are met
if any is missing, doubt it.

Check to track your progress (stored locally)

Learning progress0%

account_treeGenealogyexpand_more

menu_bookReferencesexpand_more

Source support: Explicit

link
zh.wikipedia.orghttps://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E4%B8%89%E8%A1%A8%E6%B3%95ZH · Explicit
verified