Kuhn's Theory-Evidence Coordination
Updated 2026-08-10
INTRODUCTION
English translation pending.
CORE DEFINITION
Deanna Kuhn's theory of theory-evidence coordination describes the central challenge of scientific thinking: distinguishing a theory from the evidence for it, and understanding how evidence supports or undermines a claim. She identifies three developmental levels. Absolutism holds that knowledge is certain and there is one correct answer, so evidence either confirms or is dismissed. Multiplism holds that all opinions are equally valid, which abandons the standard for evaluating claims. Evaluativism holds that claims must be supported by evidence and can be compared and judged, which is the level genuine argument requires. Development proceeds in that order but is not guaranteed.
SCAFFOLDING EFFECT
Reduce cognitive load
- Use separation: write your claim and the evidence for it in two separate columns. - Use counter-check: ask what evidence would count against your claim before defending it. - Use level diagnosis: check whether you are treating a claim as certain, as arbitrary, or as evidence-dependent.
Anchor fast decisions
Reasoning about a contested claim requires holding a theory and the evidence for it as separate objects. At the absolutist level, evidence that conflicts with the theory threatens identity, so it is discounted. At the multiplist level, the standard is abandoned instead, and every position becomes equally acceptable. Evaluativism resolves the tension by making evidence the arbiter, allowing a claim to be revised without being discarded. Because the levels describe how evidence is treated rather than what is known, one person can operate at different levels in different domains.
MINIMUM ACTION
In progress 0/1Practice this model in one real situation:
account_treeGenealogyexpand_more
menu_bookReferencesexpand_more
Source support: Explicit
- en.wikipedia.orghttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deanna_Kuhnverified
PRIVATE NOTES · Only visible to you
SAVED Q&A
ENTRY Q&A · Private saving available
Ask with a clear boundary
thinkingmodels answers from published entry context only.
Your question is sent to thinkingmodels. The answer uses public entry context only.
RELATED MODELS