ERA
Updated 2026-08-10
INTRODUCTION
English translation pending.
CORE DEFINITION
ERA is a minimal reflection framework with three stages. Experience describes what happened, sticking to observable events rather than interpretation. Reflection analyzes what the experience meant and what feelings it produced. Action specifies what will be done differently next time. Its purpose is to keep reflection from terminating in analysis: the third step forces the loop closed with a concrete commitment. The framework assumes the reflector can separate description from interpretation, which is what makes the middle stage productive rather than a restatement of the first.
SCAFFOLDING EFFECT
Reduce cognitive load
- Use event description: write only what happened, holding back interpretation until the description is complete. - Use meaning analysis: ask what the event revealed about your assumptions or process. - Use action commitment: end every reflection with one specific behavior to change.
Anchor fast decisions
Reflection fails most often by stopping at insight, so the behavior that produced the problem repeats. ERA prevents this by reserving a stage for action and making it the exit condition. Separating description from reflection also improves the quality of analysis, because the raw event stays available to inspect rather than arriving already interpreted. Each cycle produces a testable change, and the next experience supplies evidence about whether the change worked, which makes the loop cumulative instead of repetitive.
MINIMUM ACTION
In progress 0/1Practice this model in one real situation:
account_treeGenealogyexpand_more
menu_bookReferencesexpand_more
Source support: Explicit
- libguides.hull.ac.ukhttps://libguides.hull.ac.uk/reflectivewriting/eraverified
PRIVATE NOTES · Only visible to you
SAVED Q&A
ENTRY Q&A · Private saving available
Ask with a clear boundary
thinkingmodels answers from published entry context only.
Your question is sent to thinkingmodels. The answer uses public entry context only.
RELATED MODELS