Feyerabend's Epistemological Anarchism
Updated 2026-08-08
INTRODUCTION
English translation pending.
CORE DEFINITION
Argued by Paul Feyerabend in Against Method. Major scientific advances, he claimed, did not follow a fixed method but violated the prevailing standards, using rhetoric, ad hoc hypotheses, and non-rational persuasion. His slogan anything goes expresses methodological pluralism rather than the absence of standards. He also argued that science should not be granted authority over other forms of knowledge.
SCAFFOLDING EFFECT
Reduce cognitive load
- Break the deadlock: when standard methods stall, deliberately try an approach your field considers illegitimate - Cite precedent: point to historical cases where rule-breaking produced the breakthrough - Keep standards local: judge each method by what it produces on the problem at hand rather than in general
Anchor fast decisions
Methods are abstractions from past successes and encode the assumptions of those problems. Where a new problem's structure differs, the inherited rules exclude the moves that could solve it. Pluralism keeps those moves available, at the cost of the guarantees a shared method provides, which is why it works best at the frontier and poorly on routine problems.
MINIMUM ACTION
In progress 0/1Practice this model in one real situation:
account_treeGenealogyexpand_more
menu_bookReferencesexpand_more
Source support: Explicit
- en.wikipedia.orghttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Feyerabendverified
PRIVATE NOTES · Only visible to you
SAVED Q&A
ENTRY Q&A · Private saving available
Ask with a clear boundary
thinkingmodels answers from published entry context only.
Your question is sent to thinkingmodels. The answer uses public entry context only.
RELATED MODELS