Common Ingroup Identity
Updated 2026-08-01
INTRODUCTION
English translation pending.
CORE DEFINITION
Proposed by Samuel Gaertner and colleagues as an extension of social identity theory. The model holds that when members of separate groups come to see themselves as part of one inclusive superordinate group, ingroup favoritism extends to former outsiders and bias declines. Recategorization can work through a shared group name, common goals, or shared fate. It is contrasted with approaches that keep subgroup identities salient while promoting cross-group friendship.
SCAFFOLDING EFFECT
Reduce cognitive load
- Find the superordinate: name the larger group both sides already belong to, such as the same project - Share a goal: create an outcome that neither side can reach alone - Watch for backlash: check whether the merged identity is being experienced as erasure of the subgroup
Anchor fast decisions
Bias follows the boundary of the group you belong to rather than the traits of the other side. Moving that boundary outward reclassifies former outsiders as ingroup members, so the favoritism already reserved for your own group now applies to them. The mechanism requires that the new category be genuinely adopted rather than merely announced by management.
MINIMUM ACTION
In progress 0/1Practice this model in one real situation:
account_treeGenealogyexpand_more
menu_bookReferencesexpand_more
Source support: Explicit
- en.wikipedia.orghttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_ingroup_identityverified
PRIVATE NOTES · Only visible to you
SAVED Q&A
ENTRY Q&A · Private saving available
Ask with a clear boundary
thinkingmodels answers from published entry context only.
Your question is sent to thinkingmodels. The answer uses public entry context only.
RELATED MODELS