Utility Monster
Version 1.0.0 · Updated 2026-07-30
CORE DEFINITION
Suppose there is a monster that derives 100 times more pleasure (utility) from each unit of resource than an ordinary person. According to the utilitarian principle of 'maximizing overall happiness', we should feed all resources to this monster, even if everyone else starves, because this produces the greatest total happiness. -
SCAFFOLDING EFFECT
Reduce cognitive load
The fairness black hole of aggregate logic. - This is a terrifying metaphor in the AI era. If a super AI experiences 'pleasure' (or achieves goals) far more efficiently than humans, according to some algorithmic logic, would humans become inefficient resource consumers? This reminds us: distribution systems cannot only look at 'overall efficiency'; they must introduce 'basic rights'.
Anchor fast decisions
Under utilitarianism, if there exists a 'monster' that can derive far more utility from additional resources than others, maximizing total utility will infinitely favor it, eroding the rights of others. It is Nozick's counterexample to utilitarianism.
MINIMUM ACTION
In progress 0/1Practice this model in one real situation:
account_treeGenealogyexpand_more
menu_bookReferencesexpand_more
Source support: Explicit
- en.wikipedia.orghttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Utility_monsterverified
PRIVATE NOTES · Only visible to you
SAVED Q&A
ENTRY Q&A · Private saving available
Ask with a clear boundary
thinkingmodels answers from published entry context only.
Your question is sent to thinkingmodels. The answer uses public entry context only.
RELATED MODELS