Cum Hoc Ergo Propter Hoc
Version 1.0.0 · Updated 2026-07-30
CORE DEFINITION
Latin for 'with this, therefore because of this'. It refers to the fallacy of concluding that because two events occur together, one causes the other (e.g., increased ice cream sales cause an increase in drownings).
SCAFFOLDING EFFECT
Reduce cognitive load
Distinguishing correlation from causation. This is a more formal expression of 'correlation does not equal causation'. It reminds us to look for a 'third variable' (e.g., summer arrives, causing both ice cream sales and drownings to increase).
Anchor fast decisions
The cum hoc ergo propter hoc fallacy mistakes temporal/statistical co-occurrence for causation.
MINIMUM ACTION
In progress 0/2Practice this model in one real situation:
account_treeGenealogyexpand_more
menu_bookReferencesexpand_more
Source support: Explicit
- en.wikipedia.orghttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Correlation_does_not_imply_causationverified
PRIVATE NOTES · Only visible to you
SAVED Q&A
ENTRY Q&A · Private saving available
Ask with a clear boundary
thinkingmodels answers from published entry context only.
Your question is sent to thinkingmodels. The answer uses public entry context only.
RELATED MODELS