MENTAL MODEL · M0825

Human-in-the-loop

DecideHigh supportDecision Science

Included

Version 1.0.0 · Updated 2026-07-30

CORE DEFINITION

In critical decision-making systems (such as weapon launch, medical diagnosis), no matter how advanced the algorithm, there must be a provision for human intervention and final confirmation, preventing machines from having full authority. Scaffold role: ethical fuse. When designing automated processes, always ask: what if the AI goes rogue? There must be a physical switch that allows a human to cut power or veto decisions at any time.

SCAFFOLDING EFFECT

psychology

Reduce cognitive load

Ethical fuse. When designing automated processes, always ask: what if the AI goes rogue? There must be a physical switch that allows a human to cut power or veto decisions at any time.

anchor

Anchor fast decisions

Human-in-the-loop refers to the retention of human review and intervention at critical decision points in automated systems, to compensate for the algorithm's deficiencies in values, ethics, and anomaly handling, with humans serving as the correction and responsibility node in the loop.

MINIMUM ACTION

In progress 0/4

Practice this model in one real situation:

Identify high-risk/irreversible decision points
Set up manual confirmation or veto at those points
Provide humans with understandable rationale and an intervention interface
Record human interventions to continuously improve the model.

Check to track your progress (stored locally)

Learning progress0%

account_treeGenealogyexpand_more

menu_bookReferencesexpand_more

Source support: Explicit

link
en.wikipedia.orghttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human-in-the-loopZH · Explicit
verified

RELATED MODELS