The Nonidentity Problem
Updated 2026-09-10
INTRODUCTION
English translation pending.
CORE DEFINITION
The nonidentity problem raises two questions: what moral obligations agents have toward future people, those who do not yet exist but may exist one day, and how those obligations, insofar as we have them, are most credibly accounted for. The problem turns on the fact that identity itself can depend on our choices, which breaks the usual framework for assigning harm.
SCAFFOLDING EFFECT
Reduce cognitive load
- Classify the effect: distinguish policies that change quality of life from those that determine who will exist. - Rebuild harm: when making someone worse off fails, find another standard for the wrong. - Assign generations: ask what is owed to people who do not yet exist.
Anchor fast decisions
The difficulty is that identity depends on our choices. When a policy shapes not only the quality of future lives but which particular people will exist, those affected would not have existed at all without the policy, and if their lives are worth living, the policy cannot be said to have made them worse off. The familiar account of harm as making someone worse off then fails to apply.
MINIMUM ACTION
In progress 0/1Practice this model in one real situation:
account_treeGenealogyexpand_more
menu_bookReferencesexpand_more
Source support: Explicit
- plato.stanford.eduhttps://plato.stanford.edu/entries/nonidentity-problem/verified
PRIVATE NOTES · Only visible to you
SAVED Q&A
ENTRY Q&A · Private saving available
Ask with a clear boundary
thinkingmodels answers from published entry context only.
Your question is sent to thinkingmodels. The answer uses public entry context only.
RELATED MODELS