Useless Place
Updated 2026-09-11
INTRODUCTION
English translation pending.
CORE DEFINITION
A walker needs only the small patch of ground beneath each step, the useful place. But if every inch beyond those footprints were dug away down to the underworld, would anyone still dare to walk? The model argues against total efficiency: the apparently useless redundancy of backup funds, idle time, and edge projects is the very substrate that gives a person the courage and the capacity to move forward at all.
SCAFFOLDING EFFECT
Reduce cognitive load
- Values redundancy: backup funds, slack time, and edge projects are load-bearing, not waste - Counters total efficiency: stripping away all slack removes the ground you actually walk on - Funds risk-taking: people dare to commit only when the ground beneath them stays continuous
Anchor fast decisions
Useful steps are possible only because continuous ground surrounds them. Remove the surrounding space and each step becomes a leap over an abyss, so motion stops entirely. The causal claim is that apparent waste supplies the security that makes committed action both psychologically and practically possible.
MINIMUM ACTION
In progress 0/1Practice this model in one real situation:
account_treeGenealogyexpand_more
menu_bookReferencesexpand_more
Source support: Explicit
- zh.wikipedia.orghttps://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E6%97%A0%E7%94%A8%E4%B9%8B%E7%94%A8verified
PRIVATE NOTES · Only visible to you
SAVED Q&A
ENTRY Q&A · Private saving available
Ask with a clear boundary
thinkingmodels answers from published entry context only.
Your question is sent to thinkingmodels. The answer uses public entry context only.
RELATED MODELS