Winner's Curse
Updated 2026-08-05
INTRODUCTION
English translation pending.
CORE DEFINITION
Described by Richard Thaler and others analyzing oil lease auctions, the winner's curse arises when bidders estimate an uncertain common value and the highest estimate wins. Because estimates are noisy, the winner is likely to have overestimated, and the price paid can exceed the actual worth. The core claim is that winning is evidence of an optimistic error. The qualification is that the curse weakens when bidders account for it by shading their bids, and it does not apply to private-value settings.
SCAFFOLDING EFFECT
Reduce cognitive load
- Use Bid Shading: Reduce your offer to account for the fact that winning implies you were the most optimistic bidder. - Use Why-Higher Check: Ask why your estimate exceeds everyone else's before submitting an aggressive bid. - Use Ceiling Setting: Fix a maximum price in advance so competitive momentum cannot push you past value.
Anchor fast decisions
When many bidders estimate the same underlying value, their estimates scatter around the truth, and the maximum of that scatter is above the truth on average. Whoever wins therefore tends to be the party with the largest positive error, which means the price reflects the most optimistic estimate rather than the value. The bias grows with the number of bidders and the uncertainty of the estimate.
MINIMUM ACTION
In progress 0/1Practice this model in one real situation:
account_treeGenealogyexpand_more
menu_bookReferencesexpand_more
Source support: Explicit
- zh.wikipedia.orghttps://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E8%B4%8F%E5%AE%B6%E7%9A%84%E8%A9%9B%E5%92%92verified
PRIVATE NOTES · Only visible to you
SAVED Q&A
ENTRY Q&A · Private saving available
Ask with a clear boundary
thinkingmodels answers from published entry context only.
Your question is sent to thinkingmodels. The answer uses public entry context only.
RELATED MODELS