Framing Effect
Updated 2026-08-02
INTRODUCTION
English translation pending.
CORE DEFINITION
Introduced by Amos Tversky and Daniel Kahneman, the framing effect shows that choices change when identical outcomes are described as gains rather than as losses. In their Asian disease problem, most participants chose the certain option when it was framed as saving 200 lives, but most chose the risky option when the same program was framed as 400 deaths. The mechanism draws on loss aversion: people avoid risk when a frame highlights gains and seek risk when it highlights losses. Key qualification: framing shifts preferences at the margin, and the effect weakens under an explicit expected-value calculation.
SCAFFOLDING EFFECT
Reduce cognitive load
- Test for consistency: rewrite the same decision in both gain and loss terms and check whether your choice holds. - Choose your frame: present the version that matches your audience's reference point. - Spot manipulation: notice when a vendor or advocate picks the frame that favors their preferred outcome.
Anchor fast decisions
A frame sets the reference point against which outcomes are coded as gains or losses. Because losses loom larger than equivalent gains, a loss frame makes the same prospect feel riskier and pushes people toward gambles that could avoid the loss. The underlying outcome never changed; only the side of the reference point it sits on did.
MINIMUM ACTION
In progress 0/1Practice this model in one real situation:
account_treeGenealogyexpand_more
menu_bookReferencesexpand_more
Source support: Explicit
- zh.wikipedia.orghttps://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E6%A1%86%E6%9E%B6%E6%95%88%E6%87%89verified
PRIVATE NOTES · Only visible to you
SAVED Q&A
ENTRY Q&A · Private saving available
Ask with a clear boundary
thinkingmodels answers from published entry context only.
Your question is sent to thinkingmodels. The answer uses public entry context only.
RELATED MODELS