Grossman-Stiglitz Paradox
Version 1.0.0 · Updated 2026-07-30
CORE DEFINITION
If markets were perfectly efficient (prices fully reflect all information), then no one would collect information (because it would be unprofitable). But if no one collects information, prices contain no information, and markets become inefficient. Therefore, markets must be inefficient to maintain equilibrium.
SCAFFOLDING EFFECT
Reduce cognitive load
Demonstrates the inevitable existence of arbitrage opportunities. A healthy system must retain some 'ignorance' or 'mispricing' as a reward for those who diligently gather information. A fully transparent and efficient world is logically self-defeating.
Anchor fast decisions
If markets were perfectly efficient, no one would pay to gather information (since there would be no excess returns), but if no one gathers information, markets cannot be efficient. Efficient markets and information production are contradictory.
MINIMUM ACTION
In progress 0/3Practice this model in one real situation:
account_treeGenealogyexpand_more
menu_bookReferencesexpand_more
Source support: Explicit
- en.wikipedia.orghttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grossman%E2%80%93Stiglitz_paradoxverified
PRIVATE NOTES · Only visible to you
SAVED Q&A
ENTRY Q&A · Private saving available
Ask with a clear boundary
thinkingmodels answers from published entry context only.
Your question is sent to thinkingmodels. The answer uses public entry context only.
RELATED MODELS