Tiebout Model
Updated 2026-07-31
INTRODUCTION
English translation pending.
CORE DEFINITION
A theory of local public goods proposed by Charles Tiebout. If residents are free to move and many jurisdictions offer different combinations of local services and taxes, households will sort into the community that best matches their preferences. Mobility substitutes for a market: it reveals preferences that voting cannot, and competition among jurisdictions pushes toward efficient local provision. The result depends on strong assumptions, including costless mobility, full information and a large number of jurisdictions, which is why the model is a benchmark rather than a description.
SCAFFOLDING EFFECT
Reduce cognitive load
- Sorting Lens: read migration as a revealed preference for a tax and service bundle. - Competition Check: ask whether jurisdictions face real pressure to improve local services. - Equity Caution: note who can move and who is trapped in the worst jurisdiction.
Anchor fast decisions
Where residents can move, dissatisfaction with local services or taxes becomes an exit option rather than a protest. Households with similar preferences cluster, which reduces the heterogeneity a single jurisdiction must satisfy and makes matching easier. Jurisdictions that tax heavily without delivering services lose residents and tax base, which creates pressure toward efficiency. Because the mechanism relies on exit, it works best for mobile and informed households and fails for those who cannot move.
MINIMUM ACTION
In progress 0/1Practice this model in one real situation:
account_treeGenealogyexpand_more
menu_bookReferencesexpand_more
Source support: Explicit
- en.wikipedia.orghttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tiebout_modelverified
PRIVATE NOTES · Only visible to you
SAVED Q&A
ENTRY Q&A · Private saving available
Ask with a clear boundary
thinkingmodels answers from published entry context only.
Your question is sent to thinkingmodels. The answer uses public entry context only.
RELATED MODELS