House Money Effect
Updated 2026-07-31
INTRODUCTION
English translation pending.
CORE DEFINITION
The house money effect, described by Richard Thaler and Eric Johnson, holds that people become more willing to gamble with recently won money than with their original stake. Because winnings are mentally booked as the casino's money rather than one's own, the perceived cost of losing them feels lower. The effect links mental accounting with loss aversion and helps explain why risk appetite rises after a run of gains, in gambling, trading and corporate investment alike.
SCAFFOLDING EFFECT
Reduce cognitive load
- Risk audit: Notice when a bonus or windfall makes you spend and bet more freely than usual. - Account merge: Treat gains as fungible with principal, since their marginal value is identical. - Streak warning: Raise scrutiny of decisions made right after a run of profits.
Anchor fast decisions
Windfalls are booked in a separate mental account from principal, so losses drawn from that account feel like giving back someone else's money rather than losing your own. Because loss aversion is measured against the reference point of the account, the perceived downside shrinks and the acceptable bet size grows. The distortion lies not in the money but in the accounting.
MINIMUM ACTION
In progress 0/1Practice this model in one real situation:
account_treeGenealogyexpand_more
menu_bookReferencesexpand_more
Source support: Explicit
- baike.baidu.comhttps://baike.baidu.com/item/%E8%B5%8C%E5%9C%BA%E7%9B%88%E5%88%A9%E6%95%88%E5%BA%94verified
PRIVATE NOTES · Only visible to you
SAVED Q&A
ENTRY Q&A · Private saving available
Ask with a clear boundary
thinkingmodels answers from published entry context only.
Your question is sent to thinkingmodels. The answer uses public entry context only.
RELATED MODELS